JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 15, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Sandra Patricia Tirado Vs. Empresa Social Del Estado Francisco De Paula Santander

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Cucuta Y El Juzgado Primero De Menores De Bucaramanga. Ordena Asumir Conocimiento Al Juzgado Primero De Menores De Bucaramanga
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Lugar donde ocurrió amenaza o vulneración de derechos fundamentales o donde se produjeron sus efectos
  • Prelación a juez del domicilio del accionante
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Ordenar al Juzgado
  2. Primero. de Menores de Bucaramanga, asumir en forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela promovida por la ciudadana Sandra Patricia Tirado contra la Empresa Social del Estado Francisco de Paula Santander se encuentra en dicha ciudad.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.